Linux Mint Is Weird

I have a MacBook Pro. I bought it back in 2007 when I was living in Australia. It’s awesome. I love it, especially the keyboard. Unfortunately, Mac OS X has pissed me off way too many times. So I jumped ship to Linux Mint 7.

Out of the box, Mint 7 supports my Mac’s Atheros wifi card and ATI video card. That’s something that not even Ubuntu managed to do. Needless to say, I was impressed.

After installing and configuring most of Mint 7, things were looking pretty good. As some of you know, I customize KDE heavily. Shortcuts, panels, virtual desktops, colour schemes, etc. Once all of that’s configured as I like it, I don’t touch’em: they’re perfect (for me).

Mint 7 ships with KDE 4 though, which uses Plasma. Trying to get Plasma configured just right is like trying to fine-tune a space ship: it sounds like fun, but it just Ain’t Gonna Happen (tm).

While trying to configure Plasma, I ran sudo aptitude safe-upgrade, and went to bed. I awoke to hell. Well, desktop hell. None of my panels were showing, the Plasma “cashew” was missing, and right-clicking on the desktop did nothing. Fark!

To make a long story short, Steely in #LinuxMint.com on irc.spotchat.org saved me. He corrected my sources.list , and after running mintupdate, life was peachy!

Apparently, one is not supposed to use aptitude’s safe-upgrade tool, because it’ll install packages that Linux Mint doesn’t want you to.

How/why/what/?!?

<steely> mint will fix packages or omit items until they get what they consider a stable base

<steely> mint uses updates levels 1 to 5 and mintupdate is set to use levels 1 to 3 by default, 4 and 5 has kernel and driver and other package updates

<steely> if you use mintupdate you will rarely have problems but if you use the terminal it ignores levels and can introduce packages that conflict with mint's patches / fixes

So there you have it. When running Linux Mint, use mintUpdate, not aptitude, to perform upgrades.

In case anyone else is plagued by this problem, the solution is to comment out this line in /etc/apt/sources.list :

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kubuntu-ppa/ppa/ubuntu jaunty main

and uncomment this line:

deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ jaunty-backports main restricted universe multiverse

Next, use mintUpdate to upgrade the rest of your packages, reboot, and pray to whichever god(s) you believe in.

Posted in GNU/Linux Tagged

Idiosynchracy With Apache Rewrites

Did you know that it’s not possible to apply an Apache rewrite condition to multiple rewrite rules? I thought this would work, but requests from every IP address were being redirected:

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^10.0.10.10$
RewriteRule ^uploads/(.*)$ /wp-content/uploads/$1
RewriteRule (.*) http://deadorange.com/blog$1 [L,R=301]

It turns out that RewriteCond directives only apply to the following RewriteRule. So my rewrite directives above were equivalent to “If the request came from 10.0.10.10, rewrite /uploads/.* to /wp-content/uploads/.* .Next, redirect everyone to http://deadorange.com/blog$1 .”

Unfortunately, the only solution is to repeat the condition:

RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^10.0.10.10$
RewriteRule ^uploads/(.*)$ /wp-content/uploads/$1
RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} ^10.0.10.10$
RewriteRule (.*) http://deadorange.com/blog$1 [L,R=301]

That isn’t very DRY, but if it’s the only way, we have to live with it!

Posted in GNU/Linux Tagged ,

Importing large WordPress blogs

I just finished importing a WordPress blog with >1500 posts into a different WordPress blog. Importing the posts succeeded, but the last few steps at the end failed, like recalculating how many posts are in each category. This happened because the page always timed out; the import took more than 10 minutes.

If you find yourself with this problem, the fix is easy:

  1. First, comment out the following line in wp-admin/import/wordpress.php . In WordPress 2.8.4, it’s line 367.
    set_time_limit( 60 );
  2. Configure your web server to allow PHP scripts to execute for a long time. In Apache, you do that with the “Timeout” directive:
    Timeout 6000

    This can be put within a specific virtual host, or configured globally.

  3. Increase PHP’s max execution time. This is done with the “max_execution_time” setting in the appropriate php.ini :
    max_execution_time = 600    ; Maximum execution time of each script, in seconds

    or within your web server’s configuration, if that’s allowed. For example, within Apache, you include this globally, or within a virtual host:

    <IfModule mod_php5.c>  php_value max_execution_time 6000</IfModule>

Posted in GNU/Linux Tagged , ,

Hashes and Frozen Keys

The hash class freezes keys that are strings:

This can be a problem if you want to use those keys later on…more specifically, if you want to extract and edit those strings:

Unfortunately, those strings will have to be duped or cloned:

Posted in Coding Tagged ,

Sinatra and Passenger/mod_rails

If you want Apache to serve up a Sinatra app, your best bet is to use Passenger (AKA mod_rails).

All your app needs is the usual Rackup config file (config.ru) in the app’s root directory, and the directory public/ .

There’s one caveat, though: if you have a file named environment.rb , do not put it in config/ .

If mod_rails finds config/environment.rb , it’ll think your app runs on Rails:

Posted in Coding Tagged , , ,

Ruby in Etch

As some of you may know, Ruby and Debian’s ways of packaging software go together like Darwin and religious zealots…as in, they don’t. So how should you install Ruby when using Debian Stable? How do you stay up-to-date with new versions of Ruby and gems?

By using Backports, and not worrying so much.

First, setup your box to be able to install backports of packages. Next, uninstall any Ruby-related packages. Yeah, that’s right. Do you know why? Because, if you’re running Etch, you’re using Ruby 1.8.5! Egad! That’s almost medieval. Make sure to uninstall irb and rdoc, too.

Now it’s time to install shinier versions…1.8.7, to be exact:

$ sudo aptitude install -t etch-backports libruby1.8 ruby1.8 rdoc1.8 irb1.8

All of that should be on one line.

There you have it. Now you’ve got Ruby 1.8.7 on Debian Stable (AKA “Etch”Smilie: ;). Ruby’s not complete without RubyGems, though. Download the latest version to /usr/src/ , and extract it:

$ cd /usr/src/$ wget http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/45905/rubygems-1.3.1.tgz$ tar zxf rubygems-1.3.1.tgz

Then run the setup utility:

$ cd rubygems-1.3.1/$ sudo ruby setup.rb

Let’s do one last thing to make life easier. The RubyGems setup script installed the “gem” command as /usr/bin/gem1.8 . I don’t want to have to type that “1.8″ every time.

$ cd /usr/local/bin/$ sudo ln -v -s /usr/bin/gem1.8 gem

There. Now we can run “gem” like the rest of the world.

Easy? Yar.

Posted in Coding, GNU/Linux Tagged , ,

Default stegosaurses

Ever heard of Jonathan Viney’s active_record_defaults plugin? It’s fantastic. In a nutshell, it enables you to specify default values for model attributes. If an attribute isn’t set when initialising a new instance, the attribute’s set to whatever the default value is.

For example, let’s rebuild that Stegosaurus class from a previous post:

class Stegosaurus < ActiveRecord::Base  attr_accessible :tail_spikes, :back_plates

  validates_numericality_of :tail_spikes,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0

  validates_numericality_of :back_plates,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0end

With that, if we created a new Stegosaurus and didn’t specify any attributes, not only would it have no tail spikes or back plates, but the model instance wouldn’t be valid.

To fix that, all we need to do is add two lines:

class Stegosaurus < ActiveRecord::Base  attr_accessible :tail_spikes, :back_plates

  default :tail_spikes => 4  default :back_plates => 6

  validates_numericality_of :tail_spikes,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0

  validates_numericality_of :back_plates,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0end

And voila, new Stegosaurus objects will automatically have 4 tail spikes and 6 back plates:

>> s = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus tail_spikes: 4, back_plates: 6>>> ?> s.tail_spikes=> 4>> s.back_plates=> 6

However, if used improperly, this can lead to several hours of pounding your head on your desk. Note that that the default values we used above, 4 and 6, are immutable objects. You can’t change them. You can perform operations on them, such as addition (4 + 1), but that never changes the object.

Say we want our Stegosaurus class to have an array specifying its diet that defaults to “fern” and “cycad”:

class Stegosaurus < ActiveRecord::Base  attr_accessible :tail_spikes, :back_plates, :diet

  default :tail_spikes => 4  default :back_plates => 6  default :diet => %w(fern cycad)

  validates_numericality_of :tail_spikes,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0

  validates_numericality_of :back_plates,    :only_integer             => true,    :greater_than_or_equal_to => 0end

That looks right. But watch this:

=> charles = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus tail_spikes: 4, back_plates: 6, diet: ["fern", "cycad"]>>> ?> arnold = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus tail_spikes: 4, back_plates: 6, diet: ["fern", "cycad"]>>> ?> charles.diet < < 'moss'=> ["fern", "cycad", "moss"]>> ?> arnold.diet=> ["fern", "cycad", "moss"]

We didn’t mean to do that…Arnold doesn’t want to eat moss!

At the moment, when the Stegosaurus class is initialised, it creates one Array for the default “diet” attribute of all future Stegosaurus objects. In other words, Charles’ and Arnolds’ “diet” attributes were references to the same object:

>> charles.diet.object_id=> 19103090>> ?> arnold.diet.object_id=> 19103090

How do we fix that? We tell the Stegosaurus class to create a new Array for each model instance. Simply change this:

default :diet => %w(fern cycad)

to this:

default :diet => Proc.new { %w(fern cycad) }

Now each time we create a new Stegosaurus, that Proc will fire, and create a new “diet” Array:

=> charles = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus tail_spikes: 4, back_plates: 6, diet: ["fern", "cycad"]>>> ?> arnold = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus tail_spikes: 4, back_plates: 6, diet: ["fern", "cycad"]>>> ?> charles.diet < < 'moss'=> ["fern", "cycad", "moss"]>> ?> arnold.diet=> ["fern", "cycad"]

I highly recommend giving active_record_defaults a try. It’s very handy, and very easy to use.

And by the way, yes, I was bitten by this problem. Why else would I be writing about it! Can you guess how I discovered it, though? … My tests picked it up!

Posted in Coding, Ruby Tagged , , ,

Toblerone

Why is Toblerone so damn tasty? Y’know what? It doesn’t matter. All that matters is access to it when desired. My parents each gave me a huge Toblerone bar for Christmas. The first one went quickly, and I’ve been savouring the second one…but it’s nearly done, too!

Posted in Other Tagged

Windows Preview: BSOD

The power went out last night, so I’m at my Dad’s house right now, leeching his heat, electricity, and intertubes connection.

I opened up Finder, and noticed that MacOS had found a computer on the LAN. I clicked “Get Info” on it, and well..I’ll let the image speak for itself:

What Apple thinks of Windows
I love finding small touches like that. It reminds me that there are real people at work behind the things we use every day.

Posted in Other Tagged

Friends don’t let friends code without tests

But what if your friends don’t write tests? Or what if you’re just lazy? Well, if the latter applies, that’s your own damn fault. But if nobody around you tests their code, you’re probably not going to be motivated to test your own code. But, fear not! RSpec is here!

RSpec is a really awesome testing framework. By “awesome”, I mean that it:

  • makes it easy to write tests;
  • makes your tests easy to read;
  • gives you an easy development path to follow.

It accomplishes this by following behaviour-driven development (BDD). If you’re not a keener, don’t bother following that link. Just read on for the stegosaurus.

With BDD, you write specs that describe your application’s behaviour in terms of what it should and shouldn’t do.

Let’s write an app to mimic one of my favourite dinosaurs. And while we’re at it, we’ll do some testing. But first, install RSpec:

sudo gem install rspec

Stegosauruses are known for 2 things. Let’s start with those awesome tail spikes:

class Stegosaurus  attr_accessor :tail_spikesend

That’s pretty simple. So how do we spec this? We start off by describing what we want our application to do. In this case, we should be able to grab the “tail_spikes” attribute:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus doit 'should have tail spikes' do  steggie = Stegosaurus.new

  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes=endend

Run the spec, and we’re off to the races!

$ spec stegosaurus_spec.rb.

Finished in 0.015328 seconds

1 example, 0 failures

We should also spec setting the number of tail spikes, so let’s update the spec:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus doit 'should have tail spikes' do  steggie = Stegosaurus.new

  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes=

  steggie.tail_spikes = 4  steggie.tail_spikes.should equal 4endend

That’s one of the most readable and easy-to-understand tests you’ve ever seen, eh?

Stegosauruses are also known for the huge plates on their backs:

class Stegosaurusattr_accessor :tail_spikesattr_accessor :platesend

The spec should be pretty obvious:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus doit 'should have tail spikes' do  steggie = Stegosaurus.new

  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes  steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes=

  steggie.tail_spikes = 4  steggie.tail_spikes.should equal 4end

it 'should have plates' do  steggie = Stegosaurus.new

  steggie.should respond_to :plates  steggie.should respond_to :plates=

  steggie.plates = 12  steggie.plates.should equal 12endend

Notice, though, that we’re beginning to repeat ourselves. In both of those examples (#it blocks), we create a new Stegosaurus. Let’s tidy that up a bit:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus dobefore :each do  @steggie = Stegosaurus.newend

it 'should have tail spikes' do  @steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes  @steggie.should respond_to :tail_spikes=

  @steggie.tail_spikes = 4  @steggie.tail_spikes.should equal 4end

it 'should have plates' do  @steggie.should respond_to :plates  @steggie.should respond_to :plates=

  @steggie.plates = 12  @steggie.plates.should equal 12endend

What we did there is tell RSpec to create a new Stegosaurus before each example is run. To make the stegosaurus available to the examples, it simply needs to be an instance variable.

When running your specs, there are a few different ways to format the output. I tend to use the default and “specdoc” formats. Currently, our spec’s output looks like this:

$ spec stegosaurus_spec.rb..

Finished in 0.01591 seconds

2 examples, 0 failures

But we can also tell RSpec to spit out a summary of our specs:

$ spec stegosaurus_spec.rb --format specdoc

Stegosaurus- should have tail spikes- should have plates

Finished in 0.057443 seconds

2 examples, 0 failures

Our Stegosaurus class is feeling a bit weird, though..technically, we can set the “tail_spikes” and “plates” attributes to any object:

$ irb>> require 'stegosaurus'=> true>>?> steggie = Stegosaurus.new=> #<Stegosaurus:0x602afc>>>?> steggie.tail_spikes = "we don't want to be able to do this!"=> "we don't want to be able to do this!"

So we need to restrict those two attributes to integers:

class Stegosaurusattr_reader :tail_spikesattr_reader :plates

def tail_spikes=(number_of_tail_spikes)  raise ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_tail_spikes) must be a Fixnum.' unless number_of_tail_spikes.is_a? Fixnum

  @tail_spikes = number_of_tail_spikesend

def plates=(number_of_plates)  raise ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_plates) must be a Fixnum.' unless number_of_plates.is_a? Fixnum

  @plates = number_of_platesendend

With that done, what do we need to change in our specs? We need to spec the behaviour of the 2 new setter methods:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus dobefore :each do  @steggie = Stegosaurus.newend

describe '"tail_spikes" attribute' do  it 'can only be set to an integer' do    Proc.new {      @steggie.tail_spikes = 'asdf'      }.should raise_error ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_tail_spikes) must be a Fixnum.'

    @steggie.tail_spikes = 4    @steggie.tail_spikes.should equal 4  endend

describe '"plates" attribute' do  it 'can only be set to an integer' do    Proc.new {      @steggie.plates = 'asdf'      }.should raise_error ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_plates) must be a Fixnum.'

    @steggie.plates = 12    @steggie.plates.should equal 12  endendend

Most of that is pretty self-explanatory. However, notice that we’ve just nested #describe inside of the original #describe…twice! We do this because it makes are specs read more fluidly, and it groups examples (#it blocks) together. And inside these inner-#describes, we can do anything we talked about earlier, like setup a before-block.

Let’s add one more attribute…a name:

class Stegosaurusattr_reader :tail_spikes, :plates, :name

def tail_spikes=(number_of_tail_spikes)  raise ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_tail_spikes) must be a Fixnum.' unless number_of_tail_spikes.is_a? Fixnum

  @tail_spikes = number_of_tail_spikesend

def plates=(number_of_plates)  raise ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_plates) must be a Fixnum.' unless number_of_plates.is_a? Fixnum

  @plates = number_of_platesend

def name=(name)  raise ArgumentError, 'The first argument (name) must be a String.' unless name.is_a? String

  @name = nameendend

And now the specs look like:

require 'stegosaurus'

describe Stegosaurus dobefore :each do  @steggie = Stegosaurus.newend

describe '"tail_spikes" attribute' do  it 'can only be set to an integer' do    Proc.new {      @steggie.tail_spikes = 'asdf'    }.should raise_error ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_tail_spikes) must be a Fixnum.'

    @steggie.tail_spikes = 4    @steggie.tail_spikes.should equal 4  endend

describe '"plates" attribute' do  it 'can only be set to an integer' do    Proc.new {      @steggie.plates = 'asdf'    }.should raise_error ArgumentError, 'The first argument (number_of_plates) must be a Fixnum.'

    @steggie.plates = 12    @steggie.plates.should equal 12  endend

describe '"name" attribute' do  it 'can only be set to a string' do    Proc.new {      @steggie.name = ['not valid']    }.should raise_error ArgumentError, 'The first argument (name) must be a String.'

    @steggie.name = 'Rupert'    @steggie.name.should equal 'Rupert'  endendend

Let’s run that spec now:

$ spec stegosaurus_spec.rb..F

1)'Stegosaurus "name" attribute can only be set to a string' FAILEDexpected "Rupert", got "Rupert" (using .equal?)./stegosaurus_spec.rb:37:

Finished in 0.02225 seconds

3 examples, 1 failure

Hrmmm, that’s no good. But that’s a fairly useful error message, eh?…well, sort of. It’s telling us what it expected, and what it received. The thing is, it expected “Rupert” and got “Rupert”, so what’s going on? The problem lies in the fact that you can’t use #equal? to compare strings, and that’s exactly what we’re doing. If you don’t believe me, try it for yourself:

$ irb>> 'Rupert'.equal? 'Rupert'=> false

BTW, did you notice the “(using .equal?)” hint that RSpec gave us?

Enough banter. All we need to do is change this:

@steggie.name.should equal 'Rupert'

to this:

@steggie.name.should == 'Rupert'

Shall we view our specs in all their glory now?

$  spec stegosaurus_spec.rb --format specdoc

Stegosaurus "tail_spikes" attribute- can only be set to an integer

Stegosaurus "plates" attribute- can only be set to an integer

Stegosaurus "name" attribute- can only be set to a string

Finished in 0.018755 seconds

3 examples, 0 failures

Those’re the absolute basics of RSpec. If you’re thirsty for more, check out the RSpec website.

Posted in Coding Tagged , , ,